News

Why oil is critical in preventing a return to war in Sudan

Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
By ROSIE SHARPE  (email the author)
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel


Posted  Monday, March 29  2010 at  00:00

While there are many outstanding issues in the implementation of the 2005 Sudanese peace deal, the issue of sharing oil revenue stands out as potentially decisive, and could lead to a return to war.

New evidence that shows production figures for 2009 don’t add up has emerged.

The figures, recently published by the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) — the main oil company operating in the country — for the blocks it operates in Sudan’s Upper Nile State, are 12 per cent higher than those published by the Sudanese government.

The difference — 12 million barrels — is significant. The oil, worth $370 million, is enough to power a city in the US the size of San Francisco for an entire year.

When the North-South conflict reignited in 1983, there were already significant amounts of oil deposits in the South, although it was not until 1999 that the commodity was first exported.

The revenues helped the government to fan the conflict.

Share This Story
Share

Indeed, a former finance minister has been quoted as saying that more than 70 per cent of the government’s share of oil profits was spent on “defence.”

The Southern rebels announced that oil infrastructure and personnel would be regarded as legitimate military targets, and the focus of the conflict moved to the oilfields, with hundreds of thousands of civilians being killed or forcibly displaced from their homes by forces allied to the government.

So, oil fuelled the conflict, yet, crucially, helped end it too.

Recognising the importance of sharing the revenues as per the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, signed five years ago, is key to an enduring peace.

The agreement stated that oil revenues would be shared equally between the federal government in Khartoum and the Southern government in Juba.

Since the CPA, Southern Sudan has received more than $7 billion in oil revenues, but the hoped-for development has yet to materialise.

Indeed, the region lays claim to being the poorest place in the world, with 90 per cent of its people living on less than a dollar a day,

Many blame the lack of development in the region on corruption and challenges with administering aid money.

But whatever the reason, the oil has fuelled resentment and threatens the peace process.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page »

Add a comment (0 comments so far)

.

IN PICTURES: Congo clashes

In a hand-out photograph released by the African Union-United Nations Information Support Team May 2, 2012 outgoing African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) force commander Major General Fred Mugisha (left) prepares to hand over command to his successor, Ugandan Lt. General Andrew Gutti (right) at a ceremony at the mission's headquarters in the Somali capital, Mogadishu. Mugisha had commanded the AU force since early August 2011. Photo/AFP

AMISOM handover

Malawi's late president Bingu wa Mutharika's supporter wears a "Bingu rest in peace" tee-shirt as he stands in front of the Mpumulo wa Bata Mausoleum during his funeral at his Ndata farm residence in the district of Thyolo, southern Malawi, on April 23, 2012. Photo/AFP/Amos Gumulira

Final send off for Mutharika

Sudanese carry an Armed Forces officer as they gather outside the Defence Ministry in the capital Khartoum on April 20, 2012 to celebrate retaking the oil town of Heglig from South Sudanese forces. Border clashes between Sudan and South Sudan escalated last week with waves of air strikes hitting the South, and Juba seizing the north's Heglig oil hub on April 10.  PHOTO/AFP/ASHRAF SHAZLY

Sudan celebrates retaking Heglig